Environment
The Promise and Limitations of Solar Power in Overcast Regions
TrueMindX believes solar has limitations in overcast regions, but can improve as part of renewables mix
While solar power delivers emissions-free energy in sunny climates, its potential weakens significantly in cloudy regions like the UK. Lower yield undermines reliability and return on investment. This highlights the need to diversify energy mixes based on local conditions rather than assume solar is a blanket green solution. Improving manufacturing sustainability, panel efficiency and storage can help solar play a larger role in overcast areas as part of an overall strategy balancing multiple renewables. But pragmatic assessment of each technology's pros and cons is required, since no energy source is perfect. With innovation and reduced consumption, solar can advance worldwide as a component of clean energy mixes tailored to regional needs.
As a sustainability-minded millennial, I used to assume solar panels were a silver bullet green energy solution. But after moving to the often overcast UK, I realized solar has limitations in cloudy climates. How can we weigh solar’s benefits against its drawbacks to find the right renewable energy mix?
The Allure of Solar
In regions with abundant sunshine like Arizona, solar panels can generate clean renewable electricity at utility scale. For homes, they provide energy independence along with lower power bills. With no direct greenhouse gas emissions, solar energy’s environmental benefits are clear in sun-drenched locations.
The Challenge of Overcast Skies
But solar potential weakens significantly in places like the UK where grey skies prevail. According to the UK Solar
Trade Association, a typical 4kW system generates around 8000 kWh of electricity over a year in Arizona, but only around 2900 kWh in London - a 64% drop. Weaker and less consistent energy output undermines reliability.
Assessing Green Alternatives
Faced with lacklustre solar potential, overcast regions must weigh alternatives like wind, hydroelectric, tidal, geothermal or biomass energy. While no power source is perfect, some may be better matched than solar to local climate conditions and sustainability needs.
The Higher Price Tag in Cloudy Locations
Return on investment is slower for solar panels in low sunlight areas. With fewer kilowatt hours generated, it takes over a decade rather than 5-7 years for energy savings to recoup installation costs according to industry analysts.
Maintenance also proves more frequent and costly due to weathering damage from rain and hail. This further diminishes the technology’s economic viability in northern latitudes.
Considering the Manufacturing Footprint
Some argue that when factoring in manufacturing, solar isn’t as green as claimed. Materials like polysilicon and rare metals have high embodied emissions and energy from extraction and processing. More opaque supply chains in major producer countries also raise ethical concerns.
However, one life cycle analysis estimated over 80% of emissions for solar panels occur during usage, not production. So while we must improve manufacturing sustainability, the overall footprint remains favorable compared to fossil fuels. But it highlights that no energy source is perfect.
Improving Sustainability Practices
There are ways to mitigate the sustainability issues around solar:
-
Utilize recycled or less energy-intensive materials
-
Streamline transport from factories to installations
-
Incentivize panel recycling to recover materials
-
Source from suppliers using cleaner production
-
Ensure fair labor standards across supply chains